Lawyer sues Israel over Jesus Christ death
A Kenyan lawyer has filed a petition with
the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in
The Hague, suggesting that the trial and
crucifixion of Jesus Christ was unlawful,
and The State of Israel among others
should be held responsible, Kenyan news
outlet the Nairobian reported on Friday.
Dola Indidis, a lawyer and former
spokesman of the Kenyan Judiciary is
reportedly attempting to sue Tiberius
(Emperor of Rome 42 BC-37AD), Pontius
Pilate, a selection of Jewish elders, King
Herod, the Republic of Italy and the State
of Israel.
"Evidence today is on record in the bible,
and you cannot discredit the bible," Indidis
told Kenyan Citizen News.
Yes, those he suggests should have been
convicted during the original trial have not
been alive for more than 2000 years,
however Indidis insists that the
government for whom they acted can and
should still be held responsible.
"I filed the case because it's my duty to
upholdthe dignity of Jesus and I have gone
to the ICJ to seek justice for the man
from Nazareth," Indidid told the
Nairobian. "His selective and malicious
prosecution violated his human rights
through judicial misconduct, abuse of
office bias and prejudice."
Indidis apparently named the states of
Italy and Israel in the lawsuit because upon
the attainment of independence, the two
states incorporated the laws of the Roman
Empire, those in force at the time of the
Crucifixion.
He is challenging the mode of questioning
used during Jesus' trial, prosecution,
hearing and sentencing; the form of
punishment meted out on him while
undergoing judicial proceedings and the
substance of the information used to
convict him.
The case was first filed in the High Court
in Nairobi, but was rejected. Indidis had
then applied to have it heard at the ICJ,
which, the Kenyan news website Standard
Media(SDE) reported constituted a pre-
trial panel that would consider his case.
Indidis says he wants to establish what
crime Jesus was charged with and prays
that the court decides "that the
proceedings before the Roman courts were
a nullity in law for they did not conform to
the rule of law at the material time and any
time thereafter."
the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in
The Hague, suggesting that the trial and
crucifixion of Jesus Christ was unlawful,
and The State of Israel among others
should be held responsible, Kenyan news
outlet the Nairobian reported on Friday.
Dola Indidis, a lawyer and former
spokesman of the Kenyan Judiciary is
reportedly attempting to sue Tiberius
(Emperor of Rome 42 BC-37AD), Pontius
Pilate, a selection of Jewish elders, King
Herod, the Republic of Italy and the State
of Israel.
"Evidence today is on record in the bible,
and you cannot discredit the bible," Indidis
told Kenyan Citizen News.
Yes, those he suggests should have been
convicted during the original trial have not
been alive for more than 2000 years,
however Indidis insists that the
government for whom they acted can and
should still be held responsible.
"I filed the case because it's my duty to
upholdthe dignity of Jesus and I have gone
to the ICJ to seek justice for the man
from Nazareth," Indidid told the
Nairobian. "His selective and malicious
prosecution violated his human rights
through judicial misconduct, abuse of
office bias and prejudice."
Indidis apparently named the states of
Italy and Israel in the lawsuit because upon
the attainment of independence, the two
states incorporated the laws of the Roman
Empire, those in force at the time of the
Crucifixion.
He is challenging the mode of questioning
used during Jesus' trial, prosecution,
hearing and sentencing; the form of
punishment meted out on him while
undergoing judicial proceedings and the
substance of the information used to
convict him.
The case was first filed in the High Court
in Nairobi, but was rejected. Indidis had
then applied to have it heard at the ICJ,
which, the Kenyan news website Standard
Media(SDE) reported constituted a pre-
trial panel that would consider his case.
Indidis says he wants to establish what
crime Jesus was charged with and prays
that the court decides "that the
proceedings before the Roman courts were
a nullity in law for they did not conform to
the rule of law at the material time and any
time thereafter."
Comments
Post a Comment
Kindly Drop your comments to know how you feel, Thanks